Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:31:58 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Aleksander Rozman - Andy <andy@kksonline.com>
Cc:        "FreeBSD Questions @ FreeBSD.org" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: BSD Version
Message-ID:  <20020113133158.B17636@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20020113132649.0282d488@sundance.kks.net>; from andy@kksonline.com on Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:31:14PM %2B0100
References:  <00bb01c198fa$2c426800$9d56579d@india.ti.com> <5.0.2.1.0.20020113132649.0282d488@sundance.kks.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:31:14PM +0100, Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote:
> Hi !
> 
> I started working on some things (implementing some kernel stuff) and I 
> wanted to upgrade my system to latest version. Since my building of current 
> failed, I wanted to upgrade from SNAP server, but there are several 
> 5-0xxxxxx-CURENT versions. When I cvsup with tag=., do I get 5.0-Current 
> version or latest of 4.x??

You get the "head of the CVS tree", which is the current development
version, currently known as 5.0-CURRENT.

> Which is the best way to install FreeBSD-Current?

Well, a snapshot install would be fine if you're having build problems.

Kris

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8QfzOWry0BWjoQKURAm3FAKCeDePbjo95foeQPR35HQ3dSZlliQCeOowQ
4vsgAMIBnw5BgwNG4lUh9S4=
=j4LE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020113133158.B17636>