From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 5 09:49:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18487 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 09:49:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18470 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rkw@dataplex.net) Received: from [208.2.87.7] (user10.dataplex.net [208.2.87.10]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00734; Tue, 5 May 1998 11:49:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: rkw@mail.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <19980505175215.A3650@klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 11:48:15 -0500 To: Andreas Klemm From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: should we update xntp in the base system to newest ntp version ? Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:52 AM -0500 5/5/98, Andreas Klemm wrote: >The version we have is based on ntp 3.4e. >The current versions are (see http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/) > > > ntp-4.0.72g.tar.gz latest release >Should the new version be imported into /contrib, if we want to upgrade ? I think so. Richard Wackerbarth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message