From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 04:02:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6BE106564A; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com (mail-gw0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3968C8FC08; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so487356gwb.36 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QeAI4rosuSo198uOtEQwxu6H/X7gXLQBGgGvCtZfJs4=; b=gPNZMWy8wQsQ9haSagnXJM2tuxWBq/e4Ls1hFr8eHGBd796fx47Wee9epYKpiMUPd+ /qkgcxnd7WIv36XlNaSnVGzKYOrQmUTztIk1qmH4APYI3cTkqEUcK/ZRcrXyrbukqWW1 K9Uu1cWLPjBD+yyMJDw1k6IVpr+Jm94nX0sdw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.191.101 with SMTP id f65mr1036650yhn.61.1315454548507; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.103.6 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:02:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <437702009.20110907235248@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <663133681.20110907193747@serebryakov.spb.ru> <437702009.20110907235248@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 12:02:28 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MykhVgpoTwnWy0rsnn1eM9Hv2Hc Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Lev Serebryakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AP performance (again): txpower regulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:02:29 -0000 2011/9/8 Lev Serebryakov : > gateway# ./athpoke 0x9934 0x9938 0x993c 0xa234 0xa238 > 0x9934 =3D 1e1e1e1e > 0x9938 =3D 1c1e1e1e > 0x993c =3D 0000003f > 0xa234 =3D 1e1e1e1e > 0xa238 =3D 1e1e1e1e > gateway# ifconfig wlan0 txpower 1 > gateway# ./athpoke 0x9934 0x9938 0x993c 0xa234 0xa238 > 0x9934 =3D 02020202 > 0x9938 =3D 02020202 > 0x993c =3D 0000003f > 0xa234 =3D 02020202 > 0xa238 =3D 02020202 > gateway# ifconfig wlan0 txpower 30 > gateway# ./athpoke 0x9934 0x9938 0x993c 0xa234 0xa238 > 0x9934 =3D 24242424 > 0x9938 =3D 1c1e2024 > 0x993c =3D 0000003f > 0xa234 =3D 26262426 > 0xa238 =3D 26262626 These look fine, but I don't have as much experience with the ar5212 series stuff as I do with the AR5416+ series stuff. > =A0It seems, registers are Ok. But clients don't see any difference! > Maybe, it is because my Senao card is "powerful" one, with additional > schematic (and power supply) to boost signal? Hm. Well, how far away are they? You can do a bit of math to see what changes the TX power on the sender side would have on the receiver signal level. Have you ever looked at doing up a free space loss model to predict what the signal level(s) should be? Adrian