From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 14:03:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECB2106564A for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636F98FC18 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-24-161-6-139.hvc.res.rr.com [24.161.6.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6AE3VLh080308; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6AE3PiT095040; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id m6AE3OIl095039; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200807101403.m6AE3OIl095039@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: edwin@mavetju.org (Edwin Groothuis) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080710120753.GA41541@k7.mavetju> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:03:43 -0000 > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:25:33PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > OK, thanx for clarification. I totally overlooked the updated bind port; > > anyhow, I use base system bind and didn't plan to change that (although > > it might me a good idea, as this situation clearly shows). > > You can always use the WITH_REPLACE_BASE option in the port to > overwrite the base system named, or use the differences in the > extracted tarball of 9.5.0 vs 9.5.0-P1 to update the source of the > base one yourself. > Shouldn't you also add : NO_BIND= true # do not build BIND into /etc/make.conf if you do, so it doesn't get clobbered? Tuc/TBOH