From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  6 14:58:45 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC40F106564A;
	Fri,  6 Apr 2012 14:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com
	[209.85.215.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060368FC15;
	Fri,  6 Apr 2012 14:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so3288049lag.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=RY/tOrBmrYcAKuXDHNQZXm/wCc67KP1ied9oEa8256g=;
	b=MZ6G32qk4FXkFqJlZCHyUdy9EwjXeup5KN9dW+cPklan8tJpbb89/bBBr1P0Sowqv0
	L7uhzHmlnwNyLjhz7RGzP19GGR0o/aBysoWHxTHdGosZHt9VIQ7KI27qHL6zXuXQQaud
	s2ODs47xG6RrdnzJ5Iae1ENDsExz9+iqlm2/OXDII0HRSM5kLT7U2WoY73RkZYHVJuqJ
	0RsfaKjQSLoE0Q8Q8h8aGUBEOS8IPbft/lMOlrtO69RC6lvbdEuVqHbBNT6JRVUNFZb/
	yrsp8X8o4pOJ6nlHkQunFgcidklIM+nttf9Fhgs2x3RcbN2fFTzjkyCUom/kw0GWfezI
	cPQw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.105.241 with SMTP id gp17mr9305937lab.21.1333724323633;
	Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.93.138 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 07:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACqU3MXOM1WOPkinxfs2YJmGbgx8-gAmUbK4L3epKPg6OpQXAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACqU3MXOM1WOPkinxfs2YJmGbgx8-gAmUbK4L3epKPg6OpQXAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:58:43 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WdYr8IUEZM3PNOlLwad926liIkw
Message-ID: <CAJ-FndDFHaKBPozhkBd6DxGo6F4UCs=9YGg0uMpB_S8iJ8Om0w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org,
	FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Scheduler + IPC performance on FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2,
	9.0 and -CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:58:45 -0000

Il 05 aprile 2012 19:03, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi folks,
>
> Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the
> `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking
> down various kind of regression/improvement. `hackbench' is a
> scheduler + IPC test (socket xor pipe). It creates producers/consumers
> groups and let a variable quantity of small messages flow happily.
> Producers and consumers are either processes xor threads.
>
> Tested platforms were
> =C2=A0- Atom D510, Intel, (incomplete)
> =C2=A0- Core 2 Quad Q9560, Intel
> =C2=A0- Soekris net5501, AMD (incomplete)
> =C2=A0- Xeon E5645, Intel (incomplete)
> =C2=A0- Xeon E5620 (dual package), Intel
> =C2=A0- Xeon E5-1650 (pending completion)
> =C2=A0- Vortex86, DMP
>
> Tested kernel were:
> =C2=A0- FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE
> =C2=A0- FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE
> =C2=A0- FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 and FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
> =C2=A0- FreeBSD 10-CURRENT as of r231573

Which means you run 10-CURRENT with all the kernel debugging options
on and MALLOC_DEBUG on?

Attilio


--=20
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein