Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com>
To:        julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer)
Cc:        jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au, jlemon@americantv.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP
Message-ID:  <199908302359.TAA15498@hda.hda.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990830162225.339M-100000@current1.whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Aug 30, 99 04:32:26 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> there are very few values that could make sense in both Hours scale and
> usecs scale..
> 
> thus items that could be small could be in uSecs and items that could
> be big could be in Secs.. A small set of functions could be used to 
>  make this uniform through the system
> 
> syscall_Secs_to_hz(ulong *ticks, boolean Allow_zero SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
> syscall_mSecs_to_hz(ulong *ticks, boolean Allow_zero, SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
> syscall_uSecs_to_hz(ulong *ticks, boolean Allow_zero, SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)

How about struct timeval instead?

Peter

-- 
Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com)   Realtime development, Machine control,
HD Associates, Inc.               Safety critical systems, Agency approval


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908302359.TAA15498>