Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:35:38 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_libchk: a missing library is not detected Message-ID: <67109269@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <4A38DAC4.4080701@bsdforen.de> (Dominic Fandrey's message of "Wed\, 17 Jun 2009 14\:00\:04 %2B0200") References: <88733235@bb.ipt.ru> <200906151009.19181.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A37BB97.8080405@bsdforen.de> <200906161101.22167.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A382604.9090206@bsdforen.de> <13510422@ipt.ru> <4A38DAC4.4080701@bsdforen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> writes: > Boris Samorodov wrote: >> Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> writes: >> >>>> Luck. The app linking to the old library will have a dependency on the old >>>> version. pkg_add will find the origin, issue a warning about "app-1.0 needing >>>> lib-0.1 but lib-0.2 is installed" and proceed. app will not start, because of >>>> the missing library. >>> I've never had this case. I've got the impression that pointyhead rebuilds all >>> dependencies. >> >> Let me remind you the case with my original question: >> 1. Graphics/eog was broken (as you said) by indirect dependency. >> 2. Pkg_libchk didn't catch the case. >> >> Did it happen by design? > > Are you certain that this was a direct dependency? Maybe just a dependency > of graphics/eog was broken. I didn't say it was a direct dependency. And the dependecy may be broken. Well, thanks for your help. Next time I'll try to have more info about a case. WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?67109269>