Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:43:02 +0000
From:      "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To:        Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, Niu Zhixiong <kaiaixi@gmail.com>, hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com>, Bill Yuan <bycn82@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: A problem on TCP in High RTT Environment.
Message-ID:  <56F2C841-6192-4C64-92B0-18BF12D07EAB@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <45B75806-ECE3-43D0-A75B-1B71A5969234@lurchi.franken.de>
References:  <CAOENNMA_CiBDJc0kchzUbTcf_JBwTJPF=PdBAUB6FPo-KzYkeQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140809184232.GF83475@funkthat.com> <8AE1AC56-D52F-4F13-AAA3-BB96042B37DD@lurchi.franken.de> <20140809204500.GG83475@funkthat.com> <3F6BC212-4223-4AAC-8668-A27075DC55C2@lurchi.franken.de> <CAOENNMCPuiYS7LHwMfOczhZ4yisjGkpOmWzv2pcAoi9Hhzb7dw@mail.gmail.com> <20140810022350.GI83475@funkthat.com> <CAOENNMB3=FZx5kSHVPDPBTtMKbmYJ=c_XNMcuYuoLPe=6U%2Bkxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOENNMARg36KH1Y%2B0wG8pd7sSf8XKnMf6g790_KiKaj3Mdwyjw@mail.gmail.com> <20140810033212.GL83475@funkthat.com> <CAOENNMA-dwPQr53bM4rzC=1eitoi-JAB4mCGx4zybFwUC=GMNg@mail.gmail.com> <17A804F3-BEA6-46F4-887F-B68750618FD9@netapp.com> <0CF85443-26AC-4931-9D00-3396C18C7690@lurchi.franken.de> <7A4120EE-60F3-4D32-89C4-C694B8DFEAE4@netapp.com> <5E8A6382-7096-495A-907C-86CE26A163A2@lurchi.franken.de> <CC9987A3-4608-4513-9D46-B81369CB8354@netapp.com> <5D3CBFDC-362E-4DB6-A132-BA842EF5B1B2@lurchi.franken.de> <CALCpEUEzBb1wCJVONNtbKnt_ZTpoPcup7O9P_03jkJCHRiAVBg@mail.gmail.com> <E9FE9F32-9079-463E-BB47-5E62E61F31BC@netapp.com> <45B75806-ECE3-43D0-A75B-1B71A5969234@lurchi.franken.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_6D45AB0D-ECFA-49AD-AC44-649F95916F0E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

On 2014-8-12, at 12:31, Michael Tuexen =
<Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2014, at 10:02, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
>> I bumped kern.ipc.nmbclusters by a factor of 100 (from 2036224 to =
203622400). As Hiren said, kern.ipc.nmbufs auto-adjusted (from 13031835 =
to 205111860).
> Just to double check: You changed it in /boot/loader.conf, right?

Yep, and it has taken effect:

# sysctl -a | egrep 'nmb|mbuf'
kern.ipc.maxmbufmem: 16680744960
kern.ipc.nmbclusters: 203622400
kern.ipc.nmbjumbop: 1018111
kern.ipc.nmbjumbo9: 904986
kern.ipc.nmbjumbo16: 678740
kern.ipc.nmbufs: 205111860
net.inet.sctp.max_chained_mbufs: 5

>> I just noticed that the total "mbufs in use" didn't seem to have =
increase when I did the 100x scaling of kern.ipc.nmbclusters (and =
kern.ipc.nmbufs auto-adjusted). Neither did "bytes allocated to =
network". Is that expected?
> I don't think so...

Am I hitting some other kernel limit on how much memory in total the =
stack can use?

Lars


--Apple-Mail=_6D45AB0D-ECFA-49AD-AC44-649F95916F0E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQCVAwUBU+nv1dZcnpRveo1xAQI0/AP+MwQU7XgTj+ppVbrmflFiQJeL27NrE+pb
Y2qxEqzpVEHu6Qzat5at7lMkjeiu88kGL1GNwi5nJeylNgfUYIA9mX+5XaGk1itR
/IHtJXd/2w6GQtK1ryFM/u2tUGPYLzvcxJoy+YLMgGyfaiLLKqVbN8LVCLZEzXt5
QBjJmKkUmY4=
=Rm5E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_6D45AB0D-ECFA-49AD-AC44-649F95916F0E--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56F2C841-6192-4C64-92B0-18BF12D07EAB>