From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 4 13:38:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA01409 for current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA01403 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA07326; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:36:01 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199609042036.NAA07326@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:36:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@mt.sri.com, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199609041858.MAA01487@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Sep 4, 96 12:58:29 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > It solves a problem in the suggested replacement for the existing system. > > No, it doesn't. As has been discussed to death in the past, it solves > *NO* problems in the past or present that can be solved. The *problem* > is a human problem that can't be solved adequately using a computer. It > needs human intervention (ala. Jordan's cookies). No 'locking' protocol > within CVS will solve the problem, as the problem exists outside the > scope of the version control software. > > 'Nuff said, you can continue to waste both my time and others, but it > will be ignored. while( cookie not present) continue; Looks like a damn lock to me. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.