From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 19 23:57:25 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id XAA04649 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 23:57:25 -0800 Received: from iros1.IRO.UMontreal.CA (iros1.IRO.UMontreal.CA [132.204.32.21]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA04644; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 23:57:21 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by iros1.IRO.UMontreal.CA (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id CAA00357; Fri, 20 Jan 1995 02:57:03 -0500 Received: (from fortin@localhost) by zap.zap.qc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.6) id UAA00731; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 20:47:57 -0500 From: Denis Fortin Message-Id: <199501200147.UAA00731@zap.zap.qc.ca> Subject: Re: Reboots under 2.0-SNAP pppd (once again). To: bmk@dtr.com Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 20:47:56 -0500 (EST) Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199501191257.EAA08752@dtr.com> from "bmk@dtr.com" at Jan 19, 95 04:57:38 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 613 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > I just upgraded my system to the latest snapshot on wcarchive. It seems > > > > now that some bugs may have crept back into the pppd code. > > > > > > This is weird! Why is nobody else reporting this? > > I have disabled routed and haven't had any reboots since yesterday. As I said earlier, I've also installed the snapshot, and it looks OK. But... if there were problems with routed, I wouldn't notice, as I'm running gated instead. -- Denis Fortin, Principal Consultant fortin@acm.org DMR Group Inc, (514) 877-3301 These opinions are my own