From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 27 19:47:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98DF16A4CE
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (adsl-68-123-40-77.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net
	[68.123.40.77])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276FD43FE3
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:47:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9S3kVen033722;
	Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:46:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from das@localhost)
	by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h9S3kUFm033721;
	Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:46:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:46:30 -0800
From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: John Angelmo <john@veidit.net>
Message-ID: <20031028034630.GC32916@VARK.homeunix.com>
Mail-Followup-To: John Angelmo <john@veidit.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <3F92E129.10307@veidit.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F92E129.10307@veidit.net>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: __fpclassifyd problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:47:04 -0000

I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that
this was fixed last night in:

	src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8
	src/lib/msun/src/e_scalb.c,v1.10

The fix was to use the old versions of isnan() and isinf()
specifically in the two places in libm where they are needed.
This problem illustrates that we need to be careful as we roll
forward support for C99 features that cannot be implemented as
regular functions, but that are regular functions in C89.  I
expect that once all that support is in the tree, we can do a
single libm version number bump and remove the compatibility hacks.