From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Dec 10 7:23:42 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 07:23:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www3.infolink.com.br (www3.infolink.com.br [200.255.108.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1725637B400 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 07:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from diala11 (unverified [200.255.108.11]) by www3.infolink.com.br (Vircom SMTPRS 4.2.181) with SMTP id for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:23:38 -0300 Message-ID: <002301c062bd$2aeb0440$0b6cffc8@infolink.com.br> From: "Antonio Carlos Pina" To: References: <00dd01c05e2e$e42a0700$0b6cffc8@infolink.com.br> <20001209112247.A22773@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net> Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL or IPFILTER? Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:23:36 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4029.2901 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, > > I believe (sorry if I'm wrong) that you can't use DUMMYNET with IPFILTER, > > only with IPFW. > > You're wrong. Thank you for your reply. Could you elaborate a bit ? I've seen while browsing a mail list archives (I think it was in false.net) that IPFILTER could not work with Dummynet. > > Besides that, I've seen a lot of people saying that IPFILTER is better than > > IPFW (faster, more powerful, etc) > > Don't know if it's faster, but IPFilter is definitely way more powerful. Could you tell us why ? A lot of people here (including me) would like to know about ipfilter... Best Regards, Antonio Carlos Pina apina@infolink.com.br To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message