From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Apr 15 14:18:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996D6D3EE88; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A45BA6B; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A13854ABC; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:18:40 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Thomas Zander Cc: "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r438525 - in head/audio/py-pyaudio: . files Message-ID: <20170415141840.GG97090@FreeBSD.org> References: <201704141603.v3EG3mh8009297@repo.freebsd.org> <20170415131653.GC97090@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:18:41 -0000 On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 03:48:20PM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > On 15 April 2017 at 15:16, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:03:48PM +0000, Thomas Zander wrote: > >> LIB_DEPENDS= libportaudio.so:audio/portaudio > >> +BUILD_DEPENDS= sphinx-build:textproc/py-sphinx > > > > This wasn't mentioned in the commit log, does it mean that docs are not > > coming pre-built now? > > Yes, exactly. I could have mentioned this in the commit log, you are right. Yes please, I'd appreciate if more of us would write more elaborate commit logs. ;-) > Certainly this is possible. So far, maintainer chose to have include > the docs unconditionally, but if you propose a patch to him ... I'll see what I can do. > > Hmm, size difference does not look too promising. :( > > Well, this is the correct tarball, have a look: > > Did you encounter problems when using it? No, no, I did not imply there is a problem, just that shrinked distfile might correlate with lack of pre-gen'ed docs. ./danfe