From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 8 10:35:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795EBA1D; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 10:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AA48FC0C; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 10:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA21337; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:35:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1ThHl2-000Fe2-6w; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:35:44 +0200 Message-ID: <50C317FE.8090609@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:35:42 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: nullfs changes MFC References: <20121208010109.GH3013@kib.kiev.ua> <20121208025816.GC88230@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121208030616.GI3013@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20121208030616.GI3013@kib.kiev.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , stable@FreeBSD.org, fs@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 10:35:56 -0000 on 08/12/2012 05:06 Konstantin Belousov said the following: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:58:16AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:01:09AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > ... >>> The merge is available at >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/nullfs_9.1.patch >> >> >> Sorry I haven't checked the latest zfs related MFC, but for some time >> there was an issue with nullfs improvements and zfs, will this mfc be >> synchronize with the mfc of the related zfs fixes? > > Corresponding zfs fixes were already merged to stable/9, as I was told. > Cc:ed Andrey to confirm it once more. Yes, a while ago. -- Andriy Gapon