Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:46:06 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Mattias Pantzare <pantzer@ludd.luth.se> Cc: David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca>, dolemite@wuli.nu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraph could be a router also. Message-ID: <3DD3005E.ABA5D49B@mindspring.com> References: <20021109180321.GA559@unknown.nycap.rr.com> <3DCD8761.5763AAB2@mindspring.com> <15823.51640.68022.555852@canoe.velocet.net> <3DD1865E.B9C72DF5@mindspring.com> <1037229061.44665.3.camel@skalman.campus.luth.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mattias Pantzare wrote: > > The problem is that they don't tell me about where you are measuring > > your packets-per-second rate, or how it's being measured, or whether > > the interrupt or processing load is high enough to trigger livelock, > > or not, or the size of the packet. And is that a unidirectional or > > bidirectional rate? UDP? > > > > I guess I could guess with 200kpps: > > > > 100mbit/s / 200kp/s = 500 bytes per packet > > 100 mega_bit_, not byte. 200kpps is 500 bits per packet, 62.5 bytes per > packet. Thanks for the correction, though it's 50, not 62.5, I think, because we are talking IP packets, not raw frames. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DD3005E.ABA5D49B>