From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jun  4 19:29:41 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA04788
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 19:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server2.rad.net.id (root@server2.rad.net.id [202.154.1.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA04747
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 19:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canary.iwan.org (iwan@dyn1193a.dialin.rad.net.id [202.154.6.193]) by server2.rad.net.id (8.7.5/RADNET) with SMTP id JAA14746 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 1996 09:29:24 +0700 (WIB)
Message-ID: <31B4F301.41C67EA6@rad.net.id>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 1996 09:37:53 +0700
From: Iwan Leonardus <riwanlky@rad.net.id>
Organization: skd
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.0-RELEASE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: stable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

I 've been heard about this -stable version, I think the -stable code is more
suitable for all 'Live' system, while the other can be accepted as other system,
especially development, and personal system.

In the BSD world, I also heard this BSDI OS as commercial BSD OS, which is suppose
to be more 'stable', because all commercial product is mean to work in 'Live' system

So, I am wandering what BSDI has that FreeBSD -stable do not have so we have to pay
more for BSDI OS. These information is usefull for planning and budgeting for a
system connected to Internet.

Thanks in advance and best regards

Iwan L