From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Dec 20 01:20:35 1995 Return-Path: owner-doc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA08902 for doc-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 01:20:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from cls.net (freeside.cls.de [192.129.50.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA08891 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 01:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.cls.net (Smail3.1.29.1) from allegro.lemis.de (192.109.197.134) with smtp id ; Wed, 20 Dec 95 09:20 GMT From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Organisation: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, 36325 Feldatal, Germany Phone: +49-6637-919123 Fax: +49-6637-919122 Reply-To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Received: (grog@localhost) by allegro.lemis.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA14162; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:18:14 +0100 Message-Id: <199512200918.KAA14162@allegro.lemis.de> Subject: Re: Handbook Stuff To: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:18:13 +0100 (MET) Cc: doc@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199512191410.IAA05766@bonkers.taronga.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Dec 19, 95 08:10:23 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Peter da Silva writes: > > Gary Clark II wrote: > >Another NOTE: We may want to think about doing this for the sources also. > >There are many files within the tree that say this coded was contributed > >to UCB and name the author. Make the copyright FreeBSD Project, Inc. > >and give a credit within the license to the person who developed it. > > Is that legal? > > I'm not trying to stir up trouble or nothing, but it seems a little on the > shady side. Please feel free to correct me if I'm confused... It's up to a lawyer to determine whether it's legal or not. I suspect that it's legal if we want it to be. Also, the issue of copyright doesn't mean that other people can't copy it: it means that the copyright owner has the right to decide whether other people can copy it. I think the basic intention of any copyright on the manual is that its distribution shouldn't be restricted, and that the work of the contributors should be acknowledged--very much the same as the Berkeley copyright. If you (doc people in general, not Peter) want to assign copyright to somebody to protect this right, and you're worried about FreeBSD Inc., how about assigning a fallback copyright to UCB, or just assign it to UCB in the first place, assuming they're interested in helping? Greg