Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:53:49 +0530 From: A Joseph Koshy <koshy@india.hp.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: brandon@roguetrader.com (Brandon Gillespie), wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, koshy@postbox.india.hp.com Subject: Re: Known problems with async ufs? Message-ID: <199709250428.VAA18568@palrel1.hp.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Sep 1997 22:59:38 GMT." <199709242259.PAA22462@usr03.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>> "Terry Lambert" <tlambert@primenet.com> writes > They addressed this somewhat by guaranteeing that metadata writes would > be ordered. It's unclear whether this infringes on USL's Delayed > Ordered Writes patent. EXT2FS has been around for a long time. Wouldn't the DOW patent be invalid on the grounds of ``prior art'' if the technology was similar? Just curious. Koshy <koshy@india.hp.com> My Personal Opinions Only.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709250428.VAA18568>