From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 12 00:09:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2350516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:09:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aaryn.lunarpages.com (aaryn.lunarpages.com [216.193.194.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9FB43D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:08:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from solita2@solitarylight.com) Received: from 68-173-147-104.nyc.rr.com ([68.173.147.104] helo=bsd.nyc.rr.com) by aaryn.lunarpages.com with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BjoNs-0004RY-DM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:09:28 -0700 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:08:11 -0500 From: John Wilson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040711200811.4aae968d.solita2@solitarylight.com> In-Reply-To: <75f3f70504071116405845fc32@mail.gmail.com> References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> <20040711174256.2046a84b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <75f3f70504071116405845fc32@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - aaryn.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solitarylight.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: X servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:09:00 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:40:03 -0700 Roop Nanuwa wrote: [...] > point but I was referring to things like window compositing and other > eye candy features. Personally, I'd much prefer to see things like "eye candy" take a back seat to stability, hardware support and performance enhancements/optimization of code. Eye candy should best be left up to the various window managers. - John.