Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 07:54:40 -0800 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: KSH Alignment Message-ID: <20240223155440.16B282FF@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Would there be any interest in either replacing shells/pdksh with shells/ksh as our default ksh dependency? Or Uses/ksh.mk to select a default ksh for ports? The reason I ask is, shells/ksh has its lineage from the original AT&T ksh (shells/ksh93) and is being actively developed (see shells/ksh-devel). shells/ksh upstream is also the ksh imported into and used by CDE (x11/cde*). My position is, I'd prefer a Uses/ksh.mk. If people are interested, I'm willing to put this task on my todo list. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org e^(i*pi)+1=0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20240223155440.16B282FF>