Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:19:03 -0700
From:      Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: some ZFS questions
Message-ID:  <CAHu1Y70j-GbZWZMzvGHR5PqrgYzxhDxah8vB6hxWWhe1L2XgHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140825182440.GA57059@slackbox.erewhon.home>
References:  <201408070816.s778G9ug015988@sdf.org> <40AF5B49-80AF-4FE2-BA14-BFF86164EAA8@kraus-haus.org> <201408211007.s7LA7YGd002430@sdf.org> <20140822005911.GA52625@neutralgood.org> <201408241027.s7OARfEK004658@sdf.org> <53FB0AFD.6010507@cyberleo.net> <20140825182440.GA57059@slackbox.erewhon.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> With modern drives the data density is so high that it is almost impossible to
> retrieve single overwritten bits, let alone bytes or files if the complete
> disks was filled with zeroes.

That is unfortunately naive - all modern drives, whether spinning
platters or SSDs, silently remap sectors when they detect incipient
errors, for wear leveling in the case of SSDs, etc.  This means that
it is possible for someone with direct access to the disk to recover
whole sectors - sectors that you cannot erase, no matter how many
synchronous writes you perform in the OS.

- M



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y70j-GbZWZMzvGHR5PqrgYzxhDxah8vB6hxWWhe1L2XgHQ>