From owner-cvs-all Mon Feb 11 4:37:42 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13BF37B400; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:37:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364832E; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:37:36 -0600 (CST) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.cc (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1BCbaF93838; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:37:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:37:36 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group , Cy Schubert , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, will@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5-beta [...] Message-ID: <20020211123735.GA93782@madman.nectar.cc> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group , Cy Schubert , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, will@FreeBSD.org References: <20020211015635.GB65324@madman.nectar.cc> <200202110319.g1B3JPu09732@cwsys.cwsent.com> <20020211122615.GU82640@squall.waterspout.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020211122615.GU82640@squall.waterspout.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:26:15AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 07:18:53PM -0800, Cy Schubert - CITS Open > Systems Group wrote: > > In message <20020211015635.GB65324@madman.nectar.cc>, "Jacques > > A. Vidrine" writes: > > I don't seem to remember getting this email, but... Possibly because your mailer agent inserts `Mail-Followup-To' headers that do not include you: Mail-Followup-To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group , "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Cy Schubert , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org > In any case, intentionally putting a port in CVS for only a short > period is a waste either way since one could just as easily > request testers via the mailing list and this would work just > as well. I'm sorry, but I disagree. For ports with potentially complex relationships with other software, a `-beta' port is just what the doctor ordered. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message