Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:35:25 -0400
From:      Robert Burmeister <Robert.Burmeister@UToledo.edu>
To:        <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   dirhash default  maxmem and reclaimage values
Message-ID:  <521F946D.9060805@UToledo.edu>
References:  20111014135220.GA73637@icarus.home.lan

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
   Would people with experience tuning dirhash check the list[1]
   http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Suggest-changing-dirhash-defaults-
   for-FreeBSD-9-2-td5839351.html
   and contribute any benchmarks that they have that are more recent than
   2008?
   In question are:
   should vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage be increased, if so what to?
   should vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem scale with kernel memory rather than RAM?
   (Autotuning maxmem on low RAM machines makes maxmem too small,
    and on large RAM machines scavenging 10% of maxmem on vm_lowmem events
   becomes too aggressive.)

References

   1. http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Suggest-changing-dirhash-defaults-for-FreeBSD-9-2-td5839351.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521F946D.9060805>