From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 23 11:27:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9443EFE for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knu@iDaemons.org) Received: from mail.musha.org (v055125.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [124.155.55.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D7F26D9 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.musha.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 3d4Td94dWszWp67; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:19:41 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on daemon.musha.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=13.0 tests=BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT,FAKEDWORD_ONE,FAKEDWORD_VERTICALLINE,ONLY1HOPDIRECT, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_FAIL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from daemon.musha.org (daemon.local.idaemons.org [192.168.11.11]) by mail.musha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3d4Td557V8zWp60; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:19:37 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:19:37 +0900 Message-ID: <861u3cmdyu.knu@iDaemons.org> From: "Akinori MUSHA" To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: Time to mark lang/ruby18 DEPRECATED In-Reply-To: <20130925144423.GI74496@admin.xzibition.com> References: <20130923173906.GR95595@goodking.org> <20130925144423.GI74496@admin.xzibition.com> Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 081D 099C 1705 861D 4B70 B04A 920B EFC7 9FD9 E1EE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_23_20:19:32_2013-1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Abthorpe , ruby@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:27:38 -0000 --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_23_20:19:32_2013-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Great! It's fantastic to see ruby 1.8 finally go. Now, why don't we make Ruby 2.0 the default version instead of 1.9? Ruby 2.0 is highly (upper) compatible with 1.9 and there should be no reason to adopt Ruby 1.9.3 by now. Ruby 1.9 is unlikely to have any more build/platform related change that would expand supported platforms, architectures or compilers, so I think we should adopt Ruby 2.0 now that FreeBSD 10 is soon to be shipped with a new compiler and toolchain that are rapidly evolving. What do you guys think? Is there any essential package that does not run on Ruby 2.0, in which case I could help? -- Akinori MUSHA / https://akinori.org/ --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_23_20:19:32_2013-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlJnsMUACgkQkgvvx5/Z4e4G9wCfTjXLCSK8P76wY+NYQhEYqOf3 mdsAn1hy1ReOg9mXh1cJbunRtQsE0hrd =xjcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_23_20:19:32_2013-1--