Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:42:08 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please commit 124993 for cfengine-2.2.7 Message-ID: <05440975@bs1.sp34.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080701192524.GA13558@atarininja.org> (Wesley Shields's message of "Tue\, 1 Jul 2008 15\:25\:24 -0400") References: <A6B7A2BF-FD6C-4802-9851-2346ED6E4391@netconsonance.com> <20080701192524.GA13558@atarininja.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:25:24 -0400 Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:48:42AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > > cfengine hasn't had any updates for over a year now, as the maintainer > > is AWOL. I keep submitting patches but nobody commits them. > > > > The last update to 124993 contains a clean single patch from the > > current ports tree to 2.2.7. Can someone please commit this? > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124993 > I will take this one and get it addressed. The PR you are quoting has > not been around long enough for a maintainer timeout, but the other PR > you reference[1] has. I suspect this is not an acceptable condition to > override the maintainer. Why is it not acceptable to override a maintainer? This port is not an infrastructure port, the maintainer is way long unresponsive. I see only one show-stopper: there is no patch (or PR) to change the maintainer. > For now I will put it in my name and address > it once I know the appropriate course of action (wait for maintainer > timeout or if the old timeout applies to this one as well). WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05440975>