From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Feb  7 11:24: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B494837B491
	for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  7 Feb 2001 11:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f17JNmH77765;
	Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:23:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>
Message-Id: <200102071923.f17JNmH77765@iguana.aciri.org>
Subject: Re: send problem on udp socket...
In-Reply-To: <200102071919.OAA45590@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> from Garrett Wollman at "Feb 7, 2001  2:19:44 pm"
To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Cc: bright@wintelcom.net, net@FreeBSD.ORG, rizzo@aciri.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Garret,

on a similar subject (UDP sockets), i notice that
socket buffers do not have a pointer to the end of
the queued mbufs, so sbappend*() routines have to scan the
list of queued bufs. As you can imagine this is
causing some nasty effect when a receiver is slow.

Is it worthhwile to fix this (or maybe it has been done
already) ?

	cheers
	luigi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message