Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:36:48 +0200 From: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> To: Stanislav Sedov <ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org>, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/fuser Message-ID: <20060912133648.GA7943@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20060912000433.7a51cae4@localhost> References: <200609102148.26767.uberlord@gentoo.org> <20060911125816.4a606317@localhost> <200609111909.23599.uberlord@gentoo.org> <20060911235211.140f90f5@localhost> <20060912000433.7a51cae4@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:04:33AM +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote: [sysutils/fuser port] > BTW, maybe someone could commit this utility in the base system? > FreeBSD still lacks support of this POSIX app. > IIRC, someone was going to commit this year-two ago, but, unfortunately, > gave this up :-( > This version supports much more filesystems than stock fstat utility > and uses more efficient algorithms to find entries. It does not share any code with fstat(1), which is undesirable as any further changes will have to be made to both fstat(1) and fuser(1). PR standards/100017 has a better approach, putting fstat and fuser in the same binary. If the filesystem support and algorithms need to be improved, that can be done in fstat then. This PR also points to two failed fuser(1) attempts. -- Jilles Tjoelker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060912133648.GA7943>