From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 18 16:12:40 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2798A1EB
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:12:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-bn1lp0142.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.142])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com",
 Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B752467
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:12:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:f50f:2579:fc6c:3208]
 (2601:2:4780:2fd:f50f:2579:fc6c:3208) by
 CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.147) with Microsoft
 SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.985.8; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:12:35 +0000
Message-ID: <53C9476B.2030704@my.hennepintech.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:12:27 -0500
From: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com>
Subject: Re: Managing multiple repos with Portshaker/Poudriere
References: <CAHzLAVGY7PgA-b49qiN2m0djUrJKT4kGTkdeNg0BBFNV6O7L5Q@mail.gmail.com>	<53C9046A.7070805@my.hennepintech.edu>
 <CAHzLAVGZ++K3dKQbOhVeVnyL7fH62Emontg-Td9iTiqv-r-eSA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHzLAVGZ++K3dKQbOhVeVnyL7fH62Emontg-Td9iTiqv-r-eSA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [2601:2:4780:2fd:f50f:2579:fc6c:3208]
X-ClientProxiedBy: BY2PR03CA065.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.249.38) To
 CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.147)
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:
X-Forefront-PRVS: 02760F0D1C
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;
 SFS:(6009001)(189002)(199002)(24454002)(51704005)(50466002)(80316001)(64126003)(102836001)(83506001)(23676002)(65956001)(110136001)(77982001)(59896001)(42186005)(21056001)(46102001)(74502001)(106356001)(83322001)(19580395003)(80022001)(99396002)(95666004)(15975445006)(86362001)(47776003)(105586002)(92566001)(75432001)(54356999)(88552001)(50986999)(74662001)(85306003)(65816999)(87266999)(92726001)(76482001)(83072002)(20776003)(77096002)(31966008)(79102001)(87976001)(64706001)(101416001)(33656002)(4396001)(89122001)(81542001)(81342001)(15202345003)(85852003)(76176999)(107046002)(3826002);
 DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841;
 H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:f50f:2579:fc6c:3208]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords;
 MX:1; LANG:en; 
X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:12:40 -0000

On 2014.07.18 09:44, Rick Miller wrote:
> I failed to mention that we track the FreeBSD source internally which includes
> customizations.  We have implemented an internal versioning scheme.  The tags
> would be representative of the the internal versioning scheme to associate a
> particular commit to a particular release, similarly to how the FreeBSD project
> does with subversion[1]. 
> 
> 
> [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/tags/
I did not know that revisions of the ports tree were tagged this way. Now I'm
curious why.