From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 27 12:13:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from ilhawaii.net (maile.ilhawaii.net [207.12.19.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A636337B406 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:13:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from source@hilo.net) Received: from hilo.net (max3-76.ilhawaii.net [64.75.181.76]) by ilhawaii.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5RJ7IA27237 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:07:18 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <3B3A2F72.6783462E@hilo.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:09:38 -1000 From: Bruce Meier X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Microsoft References: <3B3A2720.815A74C0@acuson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sounds like divide and conquer to me. Bruce Meier David Johnson wrote: > > "Kenneth P. Stox" wrote: > > > > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/dotnet/2001/06/27/dotnet.html > > Quick summary: Microsoft is going to offer some .NET stuff for FreeBSD, > including CLI, C# and an ECMAscript compiler. Throughout the interview > the Microsoft guys, David Stutz, mumbles a lot and casts forth heaps of > double speak. > > Some particular quotes: > > "We don't feel comfortable with Linux because of the GPL nature of the > kernel ..." > > Now, I'm not a kernel hacker. I haven't written a compiler in twenty > years. I don't know anything about .NET. But for the life of me I can't > figure out why the licensing of a kernel stops them from making a Linux > port as well. Are they planning to make C# a kernel module? Are they > confused and think that glibc is under the GPL as well? > > "We have chosen FreeBSD because of licensing issues, yes." > > Didn't I predict this just one or two weeks ago? Nothing Microsoft is > doing with a .NET port to Unix has anything at all to do with the GPL. > They aren't writing any Linux kernel drivers, they aren't modifying any > GPL sources, and they aren't linking to any GPL libraries. It's nice > that they chose FreeBSD over Linux, but their motivation has nothing to > do with viral licenses. The GPL is completely irrelevant in this case. > > I'm bracing for the backlash from the Linux guys, which will undoubtedly > aimed at us... > > David > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message