From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 10:14:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760C3106567C for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F038FC28 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 28so375648hub.8 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:14:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=PEXQygbxH6JnbYqm2QDYZpBA/ZHh8L8iK9lHgYe47wk=; b=QYic0prH2haz46sTlCa9MwmkUHM3+C7pauSwcxZpTwxDMct1twyOlRjoZ7k+e0RsrKvFPKCRG6CzJ09gtWKkNkqvuNkZivlkDawYISk9QJ+b6kU+TCYJThs0mMaQInptafj6f9VDGHV0qbyv7hqPnWFApe0IakijJAKLqbRUF4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=tQdK8/6H1u5flwpT5feL4oHDE+U+hACf1vcP073GhFPabNQuQMH1A9aV8nolzcWcKAAjYeNSnOvF8e99KZGg5RIbGbBfbCmlGoTteNe1qIbL4txHe6U+FBvitE+53Xo5kN5kEGQzcWl/fm4XvpdjkFflGndxSmf1TV4BTmRZ6YE= Received: by 10.82.187.2 with SMTP id k2mr2366535buf.26.1204625692412; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:14:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ( [217.206.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z33sm1619526ikz.0.2008.03.04.02.14.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:14:51 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Evans To: "Chris H." In-Reply-To: <20080304000320.msp5bfrytc0wsowg@webmail.1command.com> References: <200803040619.m246Jbja018523@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20080304000320.msp5bfrytc0wsowg@webmail.1command.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ufLcWVksKBDfKkJ8+7Mg" Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:14:50 +0000 Message-Id: <1204625690.2126.181.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis , Mark Andrews , Andy Dills Subject: Re: What's new on the 127.0.0/24 block in 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:14:54 -0000 --=-ufLcWVksKBDfKkJ8+7Mg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 00:03 -0800, Chris H. wrote: > Hello Mark. Thank you for your thoughtful reply. > FWIW I'm hosting my own zone, out of my domain's address using a > different host name. I'm simply forwarding the requests to a different > port, so as to prevent port collision with the BIND. The zones are > answered our of 127.0.0.2 || 3. > I have absolutely no idea why FBSD v7 (on 2 machines) will only > dole out 127.0.0.1, while all my other servers running RELENG_6 all > dole out a /minimum/ of 127.0.0.1/8 by default.=20 This makes absolutely no sense. My FreeBSD 7 laptop has lo0 configured as 127.0.0.1/8 - THAT IS TO SAY, it has an IP address of 127.0.0.1 and a netmask of 255.0.0.0 . All other 7 boxes I test have the same, as do all the 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 boxes. Pray, what netmask does your lo0 have, given that you insist it has 127.0.0.1/32 ? This would show up in ``ifconfig lo0'' as=20 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffffff=20 I very much doubt it is. Tom --=-ufLcWVksKBDfKkJ8+7Mg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHzSEVlcRvFfyds/cRAlEmAKCJkD2JGVTIc/lFvfHGYGQGMu32dgCfYJTq 9xCAUUbwUp0LPMrUtMibeec= =U3FD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ufLcWVksKBDfKkJ8+7Mg--