From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 11 8:59:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ED514E38 for ; Tue, 11 May 1999 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id JAA29890; Tue, 11 May 1999 09:00:42 -0700 Received: from cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca(142.31.240.113), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda29886; Tue May 11 09:00:26 1999 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id IAA54849; Tue, 11 May 1999 08:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905111559.IAA54849@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdT54845; Tue May 11 08:59:07 1999 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: tetragon@cyber.com.au Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS question.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 09 May 1999 21:01:57 +1000." <37356B25.DC23929@bitey.cyber.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 08:59:07 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <37356B25.DC23929@bitey.cyber.com.au>, Gavan McCormack writes: > > > "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > > Gavan McCormack wrote: > > > > > I have been hearing around that NFSv3 is the only 'good' NFS, and so > far no > > > > This isn't right either. FreeBSD has had NFSv3 for quite some time. > It > > > I assume you mean in -CURRENT? This is the -STABLE list remember. :) Stil > l, > > Wrong. AFAIK, even 2.2.x has nfsv3. But only in 3.x the default > > Ok, so this list likes to keep me guessing. > > I assume then that NFSv3 cant do per-directory exporting? Or it just dosent > make a difference on any version of BSD4.4? Or, I am just doing something > wrong? > > Someone wanna clear the situation up before I install RH5.2?? (The original > question being, can I export on a per-directory basis from my 3.1-STABLE > machine, without exporting the entire local filesystem?) Actually you can export filesystems on a directory basis, without the -alldirs flag. If you want to use the -alldirs flag you'll need to jump through an extra hoop to get that working: Mount a nullfs filesystem with the directory you wish to export with -alldirs, then export that instead. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message