From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Apr 7 1:38:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (stampede.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E580B157B1; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 01:38:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca12-101.ix.netcom.com [205.186.214.229]) by stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA00407; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 01:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.2/8.6.9) id BAA77044; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 01:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 01:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904070836.BAA77044@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk Cc: nik@freebsd.org, doc@freebsd.org, br@stiller.netland.inka.de In-reply-to: <19990406191733.F6083@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> (message from Nik Clayton on Tue, 6 Apr 1999 19:17:33 +0100) Subject: Re: print/teTeX-beta port From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami) References: <199904060342.UAA06551@bubble.didi.com> <19990406191733.F6083@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Nik Clayton * You're libwww is the wrong version. I know it works with libwww-5.2.6, * because that's what it's using on my machine here, and on hub, and on * freefall (3.1-stable machines all of them). I did use libwww-5.2.6. In fact the periodic package building (which always starts with an empty /usr/local) was failing just until now. Justin's commit to www/libwww and my (still uncommitted, posted to this list) fix to teTeX-beta was necessary to get it going again. HTXML.h was including xmlparse.h, which wasn't installed by the libwww port so I have no idea how it worked for you, unless you somehow had an old copy of that file already under /usr/local. * I'm beginning to think that this might be simpler if ports like these * were duplicated in the doc repository (doc/ports?) with Makefiles that * defaulted to installing them under /usr/doc/app/{bin,share,...} * instead. We could then merge in changes from the main ports to the * copies in doc/ after testing that they still work properly. * * This would work, but is a lot of duplication. If the stuff that docproj depends on are moving too fast (and breaking a lot along the way) in the main ports tree, I agree maybe it's a good idea to put them in their own repository. I don't particularly mind the duplication (it's only port skeletons after all) but this is a different situation, when a single port works for some people but not for others. :) And the other mail: * "It works for me", and did when I installed it on hub and freefall about * a week ago. You may find it simpler to install the package until any * new wrinkles with the port are sorted out. But if it doesn't work for *me* (on the package building machine), there's no package! ;) -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message