From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 27 17:44:24 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155201065698
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com)
Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com
	[72.29.183.251])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71C58FC13
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9623C1DE7788;
	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:44:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h=
	user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type
	:content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject
	:from:from:date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t=
	1296150263; x=1297964663; bh=H0IvN2waoG/AYOO8233zVCBDNX9SVKsdksl
	jHBUQwtM=; b=m1C6ZYYVsEWf9XAGwaH9DGvZhnfjrGGFSeA9qOyi2w7WxpwrN1E
	cUR1Q0t7bOuO0gp4BqVRX0NRQxGz8sJY6dP6dtGWJtDVVpmDFmKR/k8cNwm0eoz1
	IJrFYbVyeVDj6e2IDbCFIeaF3Pq8c6w8EOLYgUYMvH3x3E6CY9yCpKuM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com
Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1])
	(amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id AFg6z9ORz1pw; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.122])
	by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 658511DE7785;
	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 5181 invoked by uid 1001);
	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:41:12 -0000
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:41:12 -0800
From: Jason Helfman <jhelfman@e-e.com>
To: Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20110127174112.GB49557@eggman.experts-exchange.com>
References: <xn0h9mifqj6hya003@news.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xn0h9mifqj6hya003@news.gmane.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE
X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bump of PORTREVISION mandatory?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:44:24 -0000

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 05:30:45PM +0000, Helmut Schneider thus spake:
>Hi,
>
>with the release of Typo3 4.5, 4.4 becomes "old stable", 4.3 becomes
>"deprecated". Therefore a change at pkg_descr is required. That is the
>only change.
>
>Do I need to bump PORTREVISION before I submit the updated port? Is
>that mandatory?
>
>I don't like the idea that someone is asked to update his/her installed
>package only because of a changed pkg_descr.
>
>Thanks, Helmut

If 4.3 is deprecated, shouldn't it be removed from the tree? (ie.
MOVED/UPDATING)

Why would you need to update the portrevision for a pkg-descr change? If it
isn't changing the behavior of the port, I don't see why that is necessary,
but others may have different ideas on this topic.

-jgh