From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 3 11:28:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07EA106564A for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB8D8FC15 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Sm1Hh-0004Wp-Gp>; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:28:45 +0200 Received: from munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.110]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Sm1Hh-00053M-E8>; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF2D76C.9010907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:28:44 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." Organization: FU Berlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120620 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4FF2B457.9030505@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.110 Cc: Sayetsky Anton , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:28:46 -0000 On 07/03/12 12:30, Chris Rees wrote: > On Jul 3, 2012 10:00 AM, "Hartmann, O." wrote: >> >> On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: >>> I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. >>> I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. >>> >> >> >> We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). >> >> devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so >> it doesn't need to be installed explicitely. >> >> I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt@. This patch also >> installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated. >> >> I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard >> backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS > activated. >> >> Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9 >> and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the >> list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on >> the "old" version? >> >> I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was >> really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was >> bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of >> notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE. >> >> This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and >> definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using > FreeBSD". > > For anyone struggling with the new version of libreoffice, I made a package > for 9/amd64. > > http://www.bayofrum.net/tb/packages/9-local/All/libreoffice-3.5.4.tbz > > Setting up a Tinderbox is easy, and will fix the problems you are having. > > Please heed advice before shouting and blaming about problems. > > Chris > Thank you very much for the package, I'll try it and report back in. Oliver