From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  5 05:30:59 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386A516A4E2
	for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  5 Sep 2006 05:30:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from soralx@cydem.org)
Received: from cydem.org (S0106000103ce4c9c.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.27.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6F243D67
	for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  5 Sep 2006 05:30:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from soralx@cydem.org)
Received: from soralx.cydem.org (unknown [192.168.0.249])
	by cydem.org (Postfix/FreeBSD) with ESMTP id 03BFE90A14;
	Mon,  4 Sep 2006 22:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: soralx@cydem.org
To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 22:30:51 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <3692C07B-CCCC-4756-9B33-6DA724481FF2@ketralnis.com>
	<000f01c6d033$3f447b80$bdcd7280$@com>
	<68AD5D02-275C-43F0-B0DB-174EDD53702F@ketralnis.com>
In-Reply-To: <68AD5D02-275C-43F0-B0DB-174EDD53702F@ketralnis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200609042230.51646.soralx@cydem.org>
Cc: dking@ketralnis.com
Subject: Re: Quiet computer
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware <freebsd-hardware.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hardware-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hardware>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hardware-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hardware-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 05:30:59 -0000


> Yes, the Via's aren't the most performant, though. They would be fine  
> for my purposes if they were slow but dual-core, unfortunately they  
> are just slow. I'm not looking for a game machine, though, I'm  

There is a dual-core version as well. I already mentioned that, AFAIR.
http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/mainboards/mini_itx/vt_310dp/

[SorAlx]  ridin' VN1500-B2