From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 11 14:46:30 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 6D879C69; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:46:30 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r383785 - in head/multimedia/kodi: . files
Message-ID: <20150411144630.GA46423@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201504111043.t3BAhJeR039178@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20150411104654.GB56364@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAFU734xtcYdyubv4tKHFGP_J7JidfkOCYaSAaBSgyxYLFPmehw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFU734xtcYdyubv4tKHFGP_J7JidfkOCYaSAaBSgyxYLFPmehw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:46:30 -0000

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 04:40:06PM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On 11 April 2015 at 12:46, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > I was under impression that since the last GitHub support overhaul, these
> > MASTER_SITES are no longer required (and just clutter the Makefile), no?
> 
> For a remotely sane distfile naming / download location / GH-setup you
> are definitely correct. The kodi project however, unfortunately does
> not abide by that.
> But neither I nor the maintainer insist on a cluttered MASTER_SITES.
> If you have a better solution, please let us know.

Ah, OK, if what you're trying to say is that dropping MASTER_SITES would
result in unfetchable distfiles, I'll shut up of course, and sorry for the
noise.

./danfe