Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:26:07 -0400 From: Charles Richmond <cmr@sitaranetworks.com> To: 'Kris Kirby' <kris@catonic.net>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <31269226357BD211979E00A0C9866DABE41205@rios.sitaranetworks.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm... I have an XP1000 system sitting at the "can't load kernel" after an install of 4.1. I understand that this issue may have been solved in the last couple of days and I admit that I have not yet had a chance to address this or even had the cycles to do more than look at the screen. However, even if this is fixed, shouldn't we let it soak for awhile before saying 4.x is production quality? If Joe Shmo ftps down an ISO of 4.1 is he going to install/boot/run? If the probability is high enough, ok. If not, lets wait. Just my 2 cents Charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: Kris Kirby [mailto:kris@catonic.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 10:37 PM > To: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) > > > > Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that > FreeBSD 4.x > for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? > > ----- > Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. > <kris@nospam.catonic.net> | > ------------------------------------------------------- > "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31269226357BD211979E00A0C9866DABE41205>