From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 16 08:56:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4498482F; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rewt.org.uk) Received: from hosted.mx.as41113.net (abby.lhr1.as41113.net [91.208.177.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CF72917; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.54] (staff-ns50-3.as25178.net [212.9.98.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rewt.org.uk) by hosted.mx.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cGdgl0b8sz1GD; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:56:51 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <520DE94E.5050200@rewt.org.uk> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:56:46 +0100 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Hang after usb on EdgeRouter Lite References: <520CC2DC.4060702@rewt.org.uk> <10d401ce9a06$c5016f90$4f044eb0$@rewt.org.uk> <111501ce9a14$b41f59e0$1c5e0da0$@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:56:53 -0000 Not getting much closer but so far 253367 works, 253845 and later don't, I can't see any mips-specific changes that might break it but I may be wrong! Thanks, Joe On 16/08/2013 01:39, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > On 15 August 2013 17:08, Joe Holden > wrote: > > I can probably fit in stepping through the revisions that are likely > to be relevant… just gone back to r252434 as a starting point and > that works fine. > > > > Sweet! Please do! I'm glad it's not that hard a regression to identify :) > > > > > -adrian >