Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:17:23 +1000
From:      Jim Mock <jim@blues.ghis.net>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: xchat & xchat-devel?
Message-ID:  <19990714221723.D5365@blues.ghis.net>
In-Reply-To: <19990712100441.B71904@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <19990712132238.A36959@blues.ghis.net> <19990712010458.B57377@dragon.nuxi.com> <19990712181355.B55317@blues.ghis.net> <199907120822.BAA68238@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990712183933.A64188@blues.ghis.net> <19990712100441.B71904@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 at 10:04:42 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > I don't know that it'll replace the current xchat port.. I mean,
> > when it gets to 1.1.10, 1.2.0 will probably become the stable
> > version, and 1.3.x the development tree (if they use their current
> > version numbering).  Am I making sense with any of this?
> 
> <IMHO>
> I ask again.
> 
> Do we really need two xchat ports?  Is the development version 
> stable in your experience?

Stable enough to use.  I don't normally use it, but my wife does, and
I would've heard about it if it was crashing on her ;-)

> Are there fundamental changes in the development version that once
> it is released, some people will want to stick with the previous
> version (perhaps forever)?

Depends on whether or not they want the Native Language Support.  It's
been broken in 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 so far in the development tree.  The
development versions compile fine without it.  I guess what it comes
down to is whether or not people want the NLS available or not.

> Do people really need to be running the development version (in an
> easy to install port manner)?  Does the development version fix
> bugs/problems with the currently released version?
> 
> If not, then I would suggest either leaving the current xchat port
> we have as is, or upgrading it to the development version (because
> it is stable in your opinion) and just let people use that.  MANY of
> us are becoming to hate the proliferage of -devel ports bloat.

Fair enough.. I was just thinking of those who use the NLS.  I think
we can just keep the current xchat port as is, and I'll keep sending
diffs to keep that one current.  If the NLS works in newer versions
I'll re-enable in the port Makefile.  Everyone agree that's what we
should do?  If I don't hear any objections within the next day or so,
I'll send the diffs to upgrade the existing port to 1.1.2.

Later,

-- 
- Jim Mock - jim@blues.ghis.net - systems administrator - ghis.NET -
- work: http://www.ghis.net/ - personal: http://www.ghis.net/~jim/ -
- FreeBSD 'zine: http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org -
- FreeBSD: http://advocacy.freebsd.org/ - jim@advocacy.FreeBSD.org -


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990714221723.D5365>