From owner-freebsd-multimedia Sat May 17 19:45:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA01307 for multimedia-outgoing; Sat, 17 May 1997 19:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA01302 for ; Sat, 17 May 1997 19:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA24175; Sat, 17 May 1997 19:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199705180243.TAA24175@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Bernie Doehner cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wincast/TV troubles (Temic PAL tuner) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 17 May 1997 19:08:27 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 19:43:24 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk If you go with an ASUS motherboard and a fx or vx model you should be all set. If you can load up windows 95 and check out the system. One thing that you can do is peruse the various mailing list for STB and see if there are any complains about the SiS chipset . I caught one such complain in the Intel Video Capture newsgroup and no one really knew what the problem was. Can you enter you configuration into the bt848 configuration web page and comment on your experience? http://www.freebsd.org/~jmg/cgi-bin/bt848.cgi Regards, Amancio >From The Desk Of Bernie Doehner : > > I suspect that your problem is the chip0 rev 49 on pci0:5 > > > > Most likely that PCI chipset is not PCI 2.1 compliant. > > > > Amancio > > Oh no! God how hardware ages! > > I suppose not being PCI 2.1 compliant could easily cause the probe to > incorrectly determine the type of card. > > Is there a program (BSD or DOS) that can test PCI 2.1 compliance on a > motherboard? > > If I were to buy a Pentium MB now, can I be reasonably certain that > something with a VX or FX chipset is indeed PCI 2.1 comliant? > > Thanks! > > Bernie >