From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 1 08:29:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C6916A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:29:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from herbelot.dyndns.org (herbelot.net1.nerim.net [62.212.117.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BF443D2F for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:29:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from [192.168.2.6] (diversion.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.6]) by herbelot.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i31GJsN9023334; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:19:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Thierry Herbelot To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:29:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Windows can lose your files X-Op-Sys: Le FriBi de la mort qui tue X-Org: TfH&Co X-MailScanner: Found to be clean MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200404011829.04221.thierry@herbelot.com> cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: implications of SMP kernel on UP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: thierry@herbelot.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:29:07 -0000 Le Thursday 01 April 2004 09:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb a écrit : > Hi, > > what are the implications on running an SMP enabled kernel on a UP > machine ? > > I first thought of things like: > - performence (most likely not worth the discussion ?) I got an improvement with a factor of ten between an SMP and a UP kernel on a HTT-enabled P4/2,6GHz/800MHz FSB on network transfers (with gigabit Ethernet boards : SMP gives about 6MB/s for FTP transfer rate, and UP gives up to 75MB/s) So : as long as the network stack is not fully locked (this is coming - perhaps for 5.3), a server should definitely run a UP kernel. TfH