From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 31 05:01:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85B816A4CE for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:01:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E343D39 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:01:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-gnome@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B8fLC-0005qY-00 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:01:10 +0200 Received: from voodoo.oberon.net ([212.118.165.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:01:10 +0200 Received: from ponomarew by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:01:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org From: Kirill Ponomarew Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Oberon.net Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <200403310656.i2V6uS7p029577@ns1.mezzweb.com> <1080731748.648.12.camel@localhost> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org Keywords: 6900018 X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: voodoo.oberon.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www -> editors and some clean up X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:01:12 -0000 John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > A number of points: > > 1) the update is good as 0.10.1 has just been released and is the stable > version; > > 2) the repo copy should be denied unless all of the HTML editors (such > as bluefish) are going to be moved from www/ to editors/; These all editors should be repocopied to editors category. > 3) intlhack WILL be needed on -STABLE > > 4) hacking the pkg-descr: a) violates the porters-handbook (as > written); b) the e-mail is correct; c) I really don't care, but nobody > better jerk me around on not having my pkg-descr comply with the > handbook; Why does it violate porters-handbook ? "It is recommended that you sign your name at the end of this file" "Recommended", but not necessary, so I also dunno why it is recommended, it's absolutly nonsense for me. IMHO, this text should be removed from pkg-plist -Kirill