From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:13:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617D11065677; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: from mail.rubicom.hu (mail.rubicom.hu [89.147.80.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145278FC0C; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.rubicom.hu) by mail.rubicom.hu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OeAjI-0007LI-5C; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:47:44 +0200 Received: from ip59935289.rubicom.hu ([89.147.82.137] helo=baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx) by mail.rubicom.hu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OeAjI-0007L5-0e; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:47:44 +0200 Received: from baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6SHlh73001941; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:47:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: (from sziszi@localhost) by baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o6SHlh8h001940; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:47:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) X-Authentication-Warning: baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx: sziszi set sender to sziszi@bsd.hu using -f Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:47:43 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100728174743.GB1856@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> References: <4C4F9D75.50500@protected-networks.net> <4C4FE9E3.8090501@icyb.net.ua> <867hkfncod.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86tynjltnd.fsf@ds4.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86tynjltnd.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: k3b causing system freeze/panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:13:42 -0000 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:42:30PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Sorry, I misparsed ATA_CAM as ahci. Why on earth would anyone want to > use ATA_CAM these days? Well, I am not sure if you really meant ATA_CAM and not ATAPICAM? But in case you meant it, for people who do not use SATA-capable hardware, ATA_CAM is useful. This laptop may be no longer be the most recent model these days, but runs -CURRENT just fine most of the time. Also, if I remember correctly, for people with a bit more recent controllers ATA_CAM offers other advantages, but those do not affect me. So, for me ATA_CAM is just a better version of the ata(4) driver... -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary