Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:24:36 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: All Berkeley db's downloads broken Message-ID: <20061128222436.GA2035@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <B7E356388F93B9BB5FCFC69E@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <9346780FF79C46C73668FD49@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <m3zmabs1ao.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <B7E356388F93B9BB5FCFC69E@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 22:34:39 +0100 Matthias Andree > <matthias.andree@gmx.de> wrote: > >DIST_SUBDIR has nothing to do with the upstream download location, but > >determines where the files are put locally when they are being > >downloaded (and obviously, where the ports system will try to extract > >the tarballs and read the patches from). > Groan - I knew that. Don't know what I was thinking there.... Nevermind, I should have notices this earlier, too... > But the checksums had changed, right? No, you only changed the paths, sorry. :-) -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061128222436.GA2035>