From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 28 1:47:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from switchlab.net (ntmail13.lightrealm.com [216.122.135.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94EE37B71B for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:47:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from seventhson@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk ([212.113.15.130]) by switchlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA07805; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:49:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AC1B2C1.8BE22BD1@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:45:37 +0100 From: Benny Prijono X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Arjan Knepper Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL References: <3AC1A050.62BE0194@pop3.NL.net> <20010328010123.A40915@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG the March 2001 edition of C++ Users Journal (http://www.cuj.com) has surveys on comformance level of each C++ compiler and STL implementation. You may want to take a look at it. cheers, Bennylp David O'Brien wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:26:56AM +0200, Arjan Knepper wrote: > > What is preffered the build-in STL (/usr/include/g++) or STLport? > > The one bundled with (and matches) G++ of course. Unless you find your > code just will not work with it. > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message