From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jun 9 6:30: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560AE15275 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id GAA67995; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906091330.GAA67995@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: David Malone Subject: Re: bin/11960: inetd built in wrapping doesn't log like tcpd does. Reply-To: David Malone Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/11960; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Malone To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/11960: inetd built in wrapping doesn't log like tcpd does. Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 14:25:29 +0100 > I think the first patch you sent, for honouring hosts_access severity > extensions should be committed, but I don't think your second patch is > desireable. That is all the final patch does, only it gets the service name right in the log file! > Hmmm, wait. I was too hasty with my "I don't think your second patch is > desireable". Ahh... > Rather, how does this handle the case of internal services? It is just doing the logging it would have done in the denied case, only with allow_severity - so I think it should work as well as inetd does anyway. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message