From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Jul 26 12:23:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from thoth.mch.sni.de (thoth.mch.sni.de [192.35.17.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D00714EBD for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:23:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer thoth.mch.sni.de) Received: from mail1.siemens.de (mail1.siemens.de [139.23.33.14]) by thoth.mch.sni.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08263 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:23:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mail1.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA26903 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:23:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA01085 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:23:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:23:24 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Maybe a stupid question about PAO, but... Message-ID: <19990726212324.A38608@internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org OK, now I am probably going to ask a really stupid question: If I understood things correctly, the PAO stuff contains extensions to support FreeBSD on mobile computers. Some support for this can also be found in -STABLE (I am currently using a SCENIC 510 AGP :-)) already. Why is the PAO stuff kept as a seperate branch? Wouldn't it be easier to maintain one branch and keep the PAO stuff simply disabled for people who don't need it? Thanks, -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message