From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Jun 8 8:54:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.163.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2B537B40B; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:54:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f58FsX915433; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f58FsSu96411; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:54:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200106081554.f58FsSu96411@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Mark Blackman" Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Jordan Hubbard , nik@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: RELNOTESng now default in 4-STABLE, *.TXT files rem oved In-Reply-To: <200106081535.QAA59472@mailhost2.dircon.co.uk> References: <200106081535.QAA59472@mailhost2.dircon.co.uk> Comments: In-reply-to "Mark Blackman" message dated "Fri, 08 Jun 2001 16:35:58 +0100." From: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1390030448P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 08:54:28 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_-1390030448P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, "Mark Blackman" wrote: > teTeX is to laTeX as Office 2000 is to Word 2000. OK. At least neither one has that idiotic paper clip. :-) (Yes, I know about editors/vigor.) > I would even go so far as to suggest that it isn't actually > appropriate for jadetex to depend on teTeX as I don't think > it requires all of that bloatware that teTeX includes. There is > even the remote possibility that jadetex only requires tex > and not latex. Sounds reasonable to me, but then again, I just use this stuff indirectly. I haven't written any "real" TeX in almost ten years. Looking forward to seeing what you and nik come up with... Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1390030448P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE7IPU02MoxcVugUsMRAmO1AJ0eOipt4jqVBYYaZ8m4ku9d0lw/qgCeOrPj jjJEvki0a+h7kh+45Z2NxkU= =14DV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1390030448P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message