From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 22 13:43:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FE8031D; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA3DA80; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8MDhb2H074954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:43:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8MDhbhF074951; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:43:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:43:37 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Johannes Meixner Subject: Re: Making CentOS 6.5 default In-Reply-To: <20140922131652.GA4045@mx12.chaot.net> Message-ID: References: <20140922131652.GA4045@mx12.chaot.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:43:37 -0600 (MDT) Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:43:45 -0000 On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Johannes Meixner wrote: > Hi there, > > now that CentOS 6.5 base and userland are in, I'd like to use the opportunity > to spawn a discussion about making it default within the next two to four > weeks (once things stabilize). Yes, the sooner the better. > The ports work necessary for that isn't complicated at all (see patch > attached). The only "issue" I see is that we'd have to get all users to set > compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 > in /etc/sysctl.conf. It would be nice to automate this, preferably not requiring the setting at all. But if required, the port should check for it and warn the user if it is not present or set to a different value.