From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 19:13:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073287B1 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com (mail-qa0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7687875 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id cr7so7013527qab.16 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:13:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SgL7Ou1xDmqGMStVhoCEo6d/qqOzuGiaB7UqwXc5LgY=; b=sdOGuvOWfWnlAWC9JpOmD1YeKrcMAHmm1t4dN7B3r2sFDYxLY5VLkESSFVubg6o+YI kbnz9m2w/SUCzs11RheVM9lDxswGpb6Z1O4Y7Tk4tMA4NwhOfwG8zdEh+3IzopkN5zfd WluviOT3RmwubEKRQU28oJHO6wEgpPdi3AXE6iVNBLX8ONiEb6547CV4V4T2OYx4GU6a lvMWMRceAHn6+f0QV/0jFs87gvQHuRkNaDxiX8Xh8JVR1vmDO29zuvjumCtCqyD0gc6F pa42VF38ngngQkpNKVFhtizZ3ssIcNUoZbEUKEFvunH8dPh8vFRmi6VVMkxin0xO+dQq oj7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.131.67 with SMTP id ok3mr23623720qeb.42.1358795581721; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:13:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.128.168 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:13:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:13:01 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the timeout of TCP in freeBSD? From: Adam Vande More To: Karthik Reddy <22karthikreddy@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:13:08 -0000 On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Karthik Reddy <22karthikreddy@gmail.com>wrote: > When I change the kern.hz to 50, the timeout is happening at 76sec. Could > you please elaborate on kern.hz and how does it effect timing. > Lower frequency so less opportunities for errors to be introduced, although you may have greater network latency at that setting. Some setting under sysctl kern.timecounter and/or sysctl kern.eventtimer should be able to allow the guest to run better if the hypervisor can't do it. -- Adam Vande More